A FEMINIST DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF GENDERED VERBAL VIOLENCE IN NIGERIAN POLITICS: THE AKPABIO AKPOTI-UDUAGHAN DEBATE

Abstract

This study examines gendered verbal violence in Nigerian politics through a feminist discourse analysis of the public exchanges surrounding Godswill Akpabio and Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. Contrary to the background of persistent patriarchal structures in African political institutions, women in leadership positions continue to encounter unfriendly rhetoric, symbolic intimidation, and linguistic demotion that undermine democratic inclusion. The problem addressed by this study is the normalization of sexist verbal aggression within Nigerian political discourse and its implications for women’s political participation. The aim of the study is to investigate the linguistic patterns of gendered verbal violence, examine the power relations embedded in political exchanges, and evaluate their broader socio-political implications. Using the Feminist Standpoint Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis, the research adopts a qualitative methodology that involves textual and contextual analyses of media reports, interviews, parliamentary reactions, and online commentaries related to the discussion. Findings show that male politicians used political language as an instrument of patriarchal dominance through mockery, delegitimization, and gender stereotyping targeted at female politicians in the political institution. The study concludes that gendered verbal violence weakens democratic rules and causes political apathy among women. It recommends firmer parliamentary ethical codes, gender-sensitive political communication policies, and institutional reforms promoting inclusive political engagement. The study further highlights the need for policy-driven protection against verbal misogyny in Nigerian democratic institutions.

Keyword: Gendered Verbal Violence, Feminist Discourse Analysis, Nigerian Politics, Patriarchal Power, Political Misogyny