PARADOX OF INTIMATE COMPARISON AND EMPATHIC REFLECTION IN RELATIONSHIP MAINTENANCE: SIMILARITY-DISSIMILARITY PATHWAYS IN MEASURING COUPLES’ PERFORMANCE ECOLOGY

Authors

  • Iboro F.A. OTTU
  • John O. EKORE

Keywords:

Empathic reflection, Intimate comparison, measurement, performance ecology, relationship maintenance.

Abstract

 Every marriage is intended to be successful through the combined efforts of the man and woman, who are expected to “work well togetherâ€. Working well together is usually the outcome of matching the couple’s strengths and weaknesses to arrive at a complementary outcome. This depends on what they brought into the union as their performance ecology. This study aimed at developing a scale to measure couples’ performance ecology in their romantic relationship. Items were generated through focus group discussions and literature review. Derived items were subjected to face and content validity, item analysis as well as principal component analysis using 1328 participants. The emerging scale has six factors (discriminated from decreasing Eigen values) including comparison distress, genetic incompatibility, reflective pride, progressive talk, relational economics and parenting acumen. The scale was also compared with four other measures to verify convergent and divergent validities. We arrived at a valid and reliable scale (with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .80) which is recommended for assessment and therapeutic intervention among couples. It has been shown that when couples are capable of demonstrating intimate comparison and empathic reflection in times of relational challenges, they are likely to cooperatively strengthen their relationship through enhanced relationship quality.  

References

REFERENCES

Beach, S. R. H. & Tesser, A. (1993). Decision making power and marital satisfaction: A self-Evaluation maintenance Perspective. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology 12: 471 – 494.

Beach, S.R.H., Tesser, A. Mendolia M., Anderson, P. Crelia, R. Whitaker, D. and Fincham, F. D. (1996). Self-evaluation maintenance in marriage: Toward a performance ecology in marital relationship. Journal of Family Psychology 10. 4: 379 – 396.

Beach, S.R.H., Whitaker, D., O’Mahen, H.A., Jones, D., Tesser, A. & Fincham, F.D. (2002). Competition in Romantic Relationships: Do Partners Build Niches? In Patricia Noller & Judith A. Feeney (Eds.) Understanding Marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction. Cambridge University Press.

Christen, A. & Jacobson, N. S. (2002). Reconcilable differences. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R. Freeman, S. & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of personality and social psychology, 34, 907-914.

Dindia, K. & Emmers-Sommer, T.M. (2006). What partners do to maintain their close relationships. In P. Noller & J.A. Freeney Eds. Close relationships: Functions, forms and processes. 305-324 New York: Psychology Press.

Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and Perspectives on Relational Maintenance Communication. In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds). Maintaining Relationships through Communication: Relational, contextual and Cultural Variations (pp 1-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates .

Edenfield, J.L., Adams, K.S. & Briihl, D.S. 2012. Relationship Maintenance strategy use by romantic attachment style. North American Journal of Psychology, 14: 1.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage Beverly Hills, C. A. Sage.

Goethals, G. R. (1984). Social comparison theory: Psychology from the lost and found. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

Gottman, J.M. & Levenson R.W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of marriage and the family 62: 737-745.

Houts, R. M., Robins, E. & Huston, T. L. (1996). Compatibility and the development of pre-marital relationships. Journal of marriage and the family, 58, 7-20.

Kassarjian, H. H. (1997). Content analysis in consumer research. The Journal Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18.

Keyton, J. (2006). Validity Communication Research: Asking question, finding answers (2nd ed.) Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification of content validity. Nurses Research 35(6) 382-385.

Margulies, S. (2010). The Annual Marital Performance Review. Psychology Today.

O’Leary, K. D. & Smith, D. A. (1991). Marital Interactions. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 191-212.

Ottu, I. F. A. (2015). Perceived performance Ecology, Dialectical Harmony, alternative partner infidelity, Empathic Accuracy and Efficacy of Integrative Behavioural Couple Therapy in Relationship Maintenance among Ibibios, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan.

Rusbult, C.E. Johnson, D.J. & Morrow, G.D. (1986). Impact of couple patterns of problem-solving on distress and non distress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 744-753.

Sigman, S. J. (1991). Handling the Discontinuous Aspects of Continuing Social Relationships: Toward Research of the Persistence of Social Forms; Communication Theory 1:106-127.

Sigman, S. J. (1991). Handling the Discontinuous Social Relationships: Toward Research on the persistence of Social Forms. Communication Theory (2), 106-127.

Smith, J. (2015). The Unveiled Wife: Embracing Intimacy with God and Your Husband. Tyndale Momentum.

Solomon, B. C. & Jackson, J. J. (2014). The Long Reach of One’s Spouse: Spouses Personality Influences Occupational Success. Psychological Science 25(12) 2189-2198.

Stafford, L., & Canary, D.J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8: 217 – 242.

Suls, J. M., & Millar, R. L. (Eds). (1977). Social Comparison Process: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Washington, D. C. Hemisphere.

Tesser, A. (1998). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behaviour. In Berkowitz (Ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 21, 181-227.

Tesser, A. Millar, M. & Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of Social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasures of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(1) 49-61.

Tesser, A., Millar, M. & Moore, J. (2000). Some Affective Consequencies of Social Comparison and Reflection Processes: The Pain and Pleasures of Being Close. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.). Motivational Science: Social and Personality Perspectives, Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-05