INFLUENCE OF RELIGIOSITY, PARENTING STYLES AND PEER ATTACHMENT ON ATTITUDE TOWARDS PREMARITAL COHABITATION AMONG TERTIARY INSTITUTION STUDENTS IN OYO STATE, NIGERIA

Akanbi Samuel Toyjn

Abstract


The study investigated the influence of religiosity, parenting styles and peer attachment on attitude towards premarital cohabitation among tertiary institution students in Oyo state, Nigeria. A descriptive survey research design of correlation type was adopted for the study. Six hundred and fifty- four young adults selected through stratified random sampling technique from three tertiary institutions in Oyo state, Nigeria were involved in the study. Four research instruments: Premarital Cohabitation Attitudinal Scale (PCAS; α= .82), Parental Authority Questionnaire(PAQ; α= .87),Inventory of Parents and Peer Attachment (IPPA; α= .81) and Religious Commitment Inventory (RCI 10; α= .77) were employed for the study. With the aid of Pearson Product Moment Correlation, the analyzed results showed that the predictor variables jointly explained about 46 percent variance in attitude towards premarital cohabitation (F(5,653) = 110.02, R2= .459, P< .001). Furthermore, in order of magnitude, the study yielded the following results as the relative contributions of predictor variables on attitude towards cohabitation: religiosity(β= -.334, t= -11.027 P<.001) permissiveness (β= .318, t= 10.475; P< .001); authoritativeness (β= -.186, t= --6.293, p<.001); authoritarianism (β = .179, t= 5.970, P<.001) and peer attachment (β = .147, t=5.012,P< .001).Also, religiosity (r= -.479, P< .001) and authoritativeness (r= -.313; P< .001) inversely correlated with attitude towards cohabitation while permissiveness (r= .465; P< .001),authoritarianism (r= .335;P< .001) and peer attachment (r= .226P< .001) sustained direct relationship with cohabitation. These results were discussed and it was suggested among other things that counselling psychologists should emphasize positive parenting in their marital counselling and that religious organizations should be involved in the efforts towards reduction of premarital cohabitation among young adults living in campuses.


Keywords


premarital Cohabitation, cohabiters, religiosity, authoritarianism, authoritativeness, permissiveness, peer attachment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adamopoulou, E.(2012). Peer Effects in Young Adults' Marital Decisions. Economics Working Papers, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economia

Adeoye, A. O., Ola, O. &Aliu, B. (2012).Prevalence of premarital sex and factors influencing it among students in a private tertiary institution in Nigeria. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 4(1), 6-9

Akanbi, S. T. (2015). Attitude towards premarital cohabitation among tertiary institution students in Oyo State, Nigeria. The Counsellor, 34(1), 35-46

Alo, O. A., & Akinde, I. S. (2010).Premarital sexual activities in an urban society of Southwest-Nigeria. Journal of Medical Humanities and Social Studies of Science and Technology, 2,1-16

Armsden, G. & Greenbreg, M. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-454.

, O. C. (2013). Cohabitation among University of Ibadan undergraduate students. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5).185-192.

Ashling, J. (2011). Premarital cohabitation as a pathway into marriage .An investigation into how premarital

cohabitation is transforming the institution of marriage in Ireland. Athlone as a case study. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, National University of Ireland, Maynooth

Bachrach, C., Hindin, M. J., Thomson, E. (2000). The changing shape of ties that bind: An overview and synthesis.

In: L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Mindin, E. Thomson, A. Thornton (Eds.): Ties that Bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter

Baumrind, D. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, R. Lerner, &A. C. Petersen (Eds.), The encyclopaedia of adolescence (pp. 746 – 758). New York: Garland

Baumrind, D. (1996). The discipline controversy revisited. Family Relations, 454- 405.

Bergan, A., & McConatha, J. T. (2000).Religiosity and life satisfaction. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 24(3), 23-34.

Brewster, K., Billy, J. &Grady, W. (1993).Social context and adolescent behavior: The impact of community on the transition to sexual activity. Social Forces, 71(3), 713–740.

Brown, S.L., Sanchez, L.A., Nock, S.L.,Deines, J.A.& Wright, J.D. (2006). Links between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital quality, stability, and divorce: A comparison of covenant versus standard marriage. Social Science Research 35(2), 454–470.

Buri, J. R. (1991). Parental Authority Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 110–119.

Cavanagh, S. (2007). The social construction of romantic relationships in adolescence: Examining the role of peer networks, gender, and race. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 572-600

Cherie A, & Berhanie Y. (2015) Assessment of Parenting Practices and Styles and Adolescent Sexual Behavior among High School Adolescents in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of AIDS and Clinical Research 6(2), 424

Connolly, J., Furman, W., & Konarski, R. (2000).The role of peers in emergence of heterosexual romantic

relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395-1408.

Cramer, K. E. (2002).The influences of parenting styles on children’s classroom motivation. Unpublished M.Sc. Dissertation, Louisiana State University.

Crissey, S.R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 697-709.

Cunningham, M., & Thornton, A. (2004).The influence of parents’ and childrens’ union transitions on attitudes toward cohabitation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, April, Boston.

Didi, N.P. (2004). Factors associated with adolescent sexual behaviour of high school girls in Vihiga district. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kenyatta University. Nairobi, Kenya.

Dolgin, K. G. (2011). The Adolescent: Development, Relationships, and Culture. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon

Duvander, A. E. (1999.) The transition from cohabitation to marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 20(5), 698-717.

Etzkin, R. (2004). How parenting style and religiosity affect the timing of Jewish adolescents’ sexual debut.

Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation. University of Florida

Fishbein, M., &Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Gadeyne, E., Ghesquiere, P., &Onghena, P. (2004). Longitudinal relations between parenting and child adjustment in young children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(2), 347-358.

García F., Gracia E. (2009). Is always authoritative the optimum parenting style? Evidence from Spanish families. Adolescence, 44, 101-131.

Hadari, J.M. (2014). Effects of students’ cohabiting in tertiary institutions. Retrieved on January 2,2017 from

http://www.dailytrust.com.ng/daily/education/20661

Holdcroft, B. (2006). What Is Religiosity? Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice 10(1),89 -103.

Jackson C., Henriksen L, Foshee V. A. (1998). The Authoritative Parenting Index: predicting health risk behaviors among children and adolescents. Health Education and Behaviour 25: 319-333

Jamabo, A. & Jamabo, T. (2010). Influence of family attachment styles on premarital sexuality of secondary school students in Rivers state, Nigeria. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 2(3), 49-55,

Kim, S., & Esquivel, G. B. (2011). Adolescent spirituality and resilience: Theory, research, and educational practices. Psychology in the schools, 48(7), 755-765.

KuluH.,& Boyle P. J. (2010). Premarital cohabitation and divorce: Support for the ‘trial marriage’ theory? Demographic Research, 23, 879–904

Liefbroer, A.C. &. Dourleijn, E. (2006).Unmarried Cohabitation and Union Stability: Testing the Role of Diffusion using Data from 16 European Countries. Demography 43(2), 203-221.

Lye, D.N. & I. Waldron. 1997. “Attitudes toward Cohabitation, Family, and Gender Roles: Relationships to Values and Political Ideology. Sociological Perspectives 40,199–25.

Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A., (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), P. H. Mussen(Series Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4 Socialization,

Personality, and Social Development (pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.

Manning, W., Cohen, J. A. & Smock. P. J. (2011). The role of romantic partners, family, and Peer networks in dating couples’ views about cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research 26,115-149.

Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2004). The changing institution of marriage: adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and marry. Retrieved on May 23, 2012 from http://www.bgsu.edu/organizations/cfdr/main.html

Martin, P. D., Specter, G., Martin, D., & Martin, M. (2003).Expressed attitudes of adolescents toward marriage and family life. Adolescence, 38, 359-367.

Mashau, T.D. (2011), Cohabitation and premarital sex amongst Christian youth in South Africa today: A missional reflection. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 67(2), Art. #899, 7 pages.

Miller, B.C., McCoy, J.K., Olson, T.D., & Wallace, C.M. (1986).Parental discipline and control attempts in relation to adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 503-512.

Mwaba, K. & Naidoo, P. (2005). Sexual practices, attitudes toward premarital sex and condom use among a sample of South African university Students. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal 33(7), 651−656.

Nazio, T., & Blossfeld, H. (2003).The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population, 19, 47-82.

Rayburn, A. C. (2007). The relationship between premarital sexual behaviors and the state of the marriage.

Unpublished M. Sc. Dissertation Louisiana State University

Rindfuss, R., Choe, K., Bumpass, L., &Tsuya, N. (2004). Social networks and family change in Japan. American Sociological Review, 69, 838-861.

Ogunsola, M. O. (2011). The effect of premarital cohabitation on quality of relationship and marital stability of married people in Southwest Nigeria. African Nebula, 3, 16 – 24

Schmidt,H. B. (2012). Cohabitation and attachment theory: Analysis of college students. Retrieved on January 4, 2017 from http://faculty.salisbury.edu/~lcgarmon

Soboyejo, O. M. (2013). Perception of students on cohabitation among undergraduates in selected higher

institutions in Ogun State. Retrieved on January 12, 2017 from http://journal.unaab.edu.ng/index.php/theses/thesis/view/4792

Stafford, L., Kline, S. L., & Rankin, C. T. (2004).Married individuals, cohabiters, and cohabiters who marry: A

longitudinal study of relational and individual well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 231- 248.

Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K. & Markman, H. J.(2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital

cohabitation effect. Family Relations,55, 499–509

Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., &Markman, H. J. (2004). Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or Non-marital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 496-519. Steinberg, L. (1999). Adolescence (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill College.

Stolz, J. (2008). Secularization Theory and Rational Choice. An Integration of Micro- and Macro-Theories of

Secularization using the example of Switzerland’ in D. Pollack and D. V.A. Olson (eds). The Role of Religion in Modern Societies, New York: Routledge.

Thatcher, A., (1999), Marriage after Modernity: Christian Marriage in Postmodern Times, Sheffield Academic Press, London.

Thornton, A., Axinn, W, & Hill, D. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. The American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628-651

Trotter, P. (2010). The influence of parental romantic relationships on college students’ attitudes about romantic relationships. College Student Journal, 44(1), 71-83.

Tucker, M.B. (2000). Marital values and expectations in context: Results from a 21-city survey. In L.J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton, Arland (Eds.).The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 166-187). New York.

Wagner, M. & B. Weiss. 2004. “On the Variation of Divorce Risks in Europe: A Meta-analysis.” Paper prepared for “The Third Conference of the European Research Network on Divorce”, University of Cologne, Germany, December 2–4.

Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J.W., Schmitt, M. M., Berry, J. T., Bursley, K. H., & O’Conner, L. (2012) . The Religious Commitment Inventory-10 (RCI-10) .Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved on June 23, 2016 from www.midss.ie

Wulff, D.M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (2nd ed.). New York:Wiley & Sons.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.