ADELUSI Johnson Oluwadare, MAKANJU O Olatunde, FAGBOHUNGBE B Oni


The aim of this study was to develop a non-specific industry psychometric instrument to measure occupational safety climate in organisations. The objectives were to identify and select factors/dimensions considered fundamental in predicting organisations’ safety climate; generate items for selected factors; determine the reliability and validity of the instrument developed; and establish the normative values for the application of the instrument.  Flowing from the objectives, one major research question was posed, and one hypothesis postulated.  Stage one of the study was used for items generation and factors determination, while stage two established the reliability and validity of the instrument as well as its normative psychometric values for its application in organisations.  Using convenience and stratified sampling techniques, a total of 540 (304 males and 236 females) participants were selected for the study. The psychometric properties of the instrument were obtained having subjected the participant’s scores to factor analysis and concurrent validation respectively.  The study results indicated that Dimension of Occupational Safety Climate Inventory–5 (DOSCI-5), with its five dimensions and 57 items, is valid and reliable in measuring organisations’ safety climate.


Occupational safety, dimensions, psychometric scale, reliability, validity.

Full Text:



Adutwum, K (2012) The psychometric properties of a safety climate scale, International Researcher.1. 4.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brown, R. L., & Holmes, H. (1986). The use of factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 289-297

Budworth, N. 1997. “The development and evaluation of a safety climate measure as a diagnostic tool in safety management”, IOSH Journal,.1.19 – 29

Creswell, R. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage


Cheyne, A., Oliver, A., Tomas, J.M., & Cox, S. 2002. “The architecture of employee attitudes to safety in the

manufacturing sector”, Personnel Review, 31, 649 – 670.

Cooper, D. 1995. “Measurement of safety climate: a component analysis” ,Institute of Safety &Health (IOSH)

Meeting on 1 Feb. 1995. Retrieved: 20 March 2016, from

Cox, S. & Cheyne, A. 2000. “Assessing safety culture in offshore environments”, Safety Science, 34, 111 - 129.

Cox, S. & Cox, T. 1991. “The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example”, Work and Stress, 5. 93

- 106

Diaz, R.I. & Cabrera, D.D. (1997). Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention,29(5), 643-650.

Dedobbeleer, N., & Béland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 97-103

Drazin, R, Glynn, M. A, & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999).Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 286–30

Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal Components Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications.

Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications Ltd

Flin, R. R., Mearns, K. K., O'Connor, P. P., & Bryden, R. R. (2000). Measuring safety climate: Identifying the

common features. Safety Science, 34, 177-192.

Guadagnoli, E. & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103. 2.: 265-75.

Guldenmund, F. W. (2010). (Mis)understanding safety culture and its relationship to safety management. Risk Analysis, 30, 1466–1480. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01452.x

Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety Science, 34, 215- 257. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X

Hecker, H. & Goldenhar, L. (2013). Understanding Safety Culture and Safety Climate in Construction: Existing Evidence and a Path Forward. Literature Review Summary for Safety Culture/Climate Workshop. The Center for Construction Research and Training. Washington, DC. June 11-12, 2013

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2006) Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health

Convention, 2006 (No. 187)

International Labour Organization (ILO).(2006). ILO Convention 187. Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006The General Conference of the International Labour Organization

Kimberlin, C. L. and Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy—Vol 65 Dec 1

Lee, T. (1998). Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant. Work and Stress, 12(1), 217-237.

Niskanen, T. (1994). Safety climate in the road administration. Safety Science, 17(4), 237-255.

OSHA (1996). Guidelines for preventing workplace violence for health care and social service workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 3148-1996

Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Thatcher, R. (2010). Validity and reliability of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). Journal of Neurotherapy, 14, 122-152.

Twycross, A. & shields, l . (2004). Validity and reliability - What's it all about? Part 2 Reliability in quantitative studies. Paediatric Nursing,16 (10). 36

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage Publications.

Zohar, D. (2011). Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. In D. Hofmann and. Tetrick (Eds.), The Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 141-164).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Zohar, D. (2003a). Safety Climate: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. In J. C. Quick & L. Tetrick (Eds.),

Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 123-142).Washington, DC: American Psychological


Zohar, D. (2003b). The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 75-92.doi:10.1002/job.130

Zohar, D. (2002). Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership based intervention model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 156-163.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156

Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro-accidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587-596. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587

Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96-102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.