The Perceived Leadership Communication Questionnaire (PLCQ-OR) is a short, reliable, and valid instrument for measuring leadership communication from the perspectives of the follower. Drawing on a need to include this research tool in future investigations focusing on Nigerian based organizations, this article describes the re-validation of the one-dimensional 6-item scale using a sample of customer service providers in the local and international airline industry (N = 298). As a result of model fit indices using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, item 2 was removed from the model being justified to be candidate for deletion as it is too similar to items 5 and 6. For internal consistency, factor loading results range from.84 to -.97, which is above the suggested threshold; Composite reliability results show (0.96) and AVE validity results show (.89), both of which are also above the threshold. Discriminant validity indicate that a moderate positive relationship exists between perceived leadership communication  and dimensions of organizational commitment; affective (r=.42, p<.05), continuance (r=.46, p<.05) and normative commitment (r=.42, p<.05).


communication, leadership, scale re-validation, Nigerian sample

Full Text:



Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application and programming (2nd Ed.). Taylor & Francis Group, New York

Fields, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd edition. Sage, Los Angeles, CA

Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. J., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2: 245–287.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39-50.

Gaskin, J. (2016). "Normality", Gaskination's Statistics. Package

George, D. and Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 17.0 Update 10th Edition, Pearson, Boston.

Gravetter, F. and Wallnau, L. (2014) Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. 8th Edition, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Uppersaddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Jablin, F. M. (1979). Superior–subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 1201–1222.

Johansson, C., Miller, V. D., & Hamrin, S. (2011). Communicative leadership – Theory, concepts and central communicative behaviors. Mittuniversitetet, Demicom/CORE: Sundsvall.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford

Luthans, F., & Larsen, J. K. (1986). How managers really communicate. Human Relations, 39: 161–178.

Malhotra, N. & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing research – An applied orientation (6th ed.). Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., Licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia

Mayfield, J. & Mayfield, M. (2002). Leader communication strategies: Critical paths to improving employee commitment. American Business Review, 20, 89-94.

Schneider, F.M., Maier, M., Lovrekovic, S. & Retzbach, A. (2015) The perceived leadership communication questionnaire (PLCQ): Development and validation. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied,

(2): 175-192,

Trochim, W. and Donnelly, J.P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base. Retrieved from


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.